![]() We tended to sketch for accuracy and quantity with a focus on industrial design sketching of products. Turn the sound off in almost all most cases. After you review and choose one for helpfulness, play and loop the video for your class, and maybe change the speed accordingly. ![]() One technique is to do a search for “product design sketching” then filter the duration for under four minutes. There are many free, short, and helpful product design drawing videos online. White Board 3D Practice Sketch – Intersecting Rounded Solids I found it helpful for students to practice up to 20 minutes per one-hour class. It’s a good idea to have students practice product sketching as much as possible during the Criterion A phase. One final note before getting into the strands deals with sketching. Process focus, product creation, and reporting out are also key components in both MYP Design and in the MYP Personal Project. For example, global contexts are emphasized to promote relevance. It’s also worth noting that the MYP Design Cycle and four criteria do support students in their MYP Personal Project (maybe sometimes called the IB personal project). In this context as well, the statement of inquiry should be presented and discussed. It is simple and naturally sets the stage for authentic learning and assessment–hallmarks of MYP Design. The GRASPS model does this well (see examples by Understanding By Design coauthor Jay McTighe). Before students conduct research, a scenario should be established to provide a context for learning and to set up the problem to be solved. ![]() In Criterion A, Inquiring and Analyzing, students define and research a problem to be solved according to the needs of a specific audience. In spite of the many moving parts, try to have a sense of what each curricular component is about before diving into MYP Design lesson planning. Related concepts should naturally emerge and meaningfully relate to the content. When I am ready to communicate the content to students, the GRASPS, global contexts, and inquiry pieces have evolved into coherent curriculum elements for students. Once these three core ingredients of the MYP Design lesson are drafted, I edit each more or less simultaneously to have them inform and improve each other. Then I try to make relevant connections to promote deeper meaning: I consult the MYP global contexts to see which best applies and simultaneously write the statement of inquiry with the inquiry questions. MYP Design has many moving parts! To get things going, this method has worked for me: When I develop MYP units, I write the GRASPS first to get the concrete elements of the lesson established. Lesson Plan Design MYP Design Lesson Planning These important relationships are intended to prepare students for further studies and for life. These criteria serve to guide students to make pragmatic connections between the content of their learning and what happens in our world outside of school. MYP Design promotes thoughtful inquiry to solve meaningful problems through four cyclic criteria. Your MYP Design project ideas start here! Most of my MYP Design experience comes from teaching to 11- and 12-year old students. ![]() I wanted to share my thoughts about teaching MYP Design by reflecting on each phase of the design process. For a slightly different perspective of MYP Design (with a focus on supporting beginning designers), check out my posts, MYP Design Basics – One Perspective, and MYP Design Assessment Criteria Modified. The Middle Years Programme Design Guide from the International Baccalaureate® (IB) Program is the resource for MYP Design teachers. MYP Design Criterion A – Inquiring and Analyzing MYP Design Criterion A – Introductionīefore we take a look at MYP Design Criterion A (the first phase), a review of the most official perspective on MYP Design might be helpful.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |